Comparison+of+theorists

This page is meant to compare the views of the theorists that we have studied. I am adding in only Hobbes's and Rousseau's views today, because I am comparing them in my paper.
 * (Should this be moved to the state of nature papper, and integrated there? Discuss here or in the state of nature page 1159325305)**

Equality
Hobbes: Hobbes discusses both physical and mental inequalities between men; however, he believes that these inequalities are a construction of society. Lack of physical strength, for example, may be compensated by a stronger mind. All men are equally vulnerable in some way or another. In terms of wisdom, Hobbes contends that all men think that they have been endowed with a good deal of wisdom, so they are at least all equally vain. Thus in the state of nature, all men are equal. Rousseau: Men are like animals in the state of nature and are equal before the introduction of society. Physical and mental inequalities do exist in society, but they are a product of man's lifestyle in society, and not his natural state (for example, a man who spends his time working in the field will have more physical strength than a man who works in an office; similarly, mental faculties are the result of education). **(This is true, but incomplete for Rousseau. The point is more that a) natural equality is great in the state of nature and b) in the state of society difference leads to dependence 1159325305)**

Dominant desires
Hobbes: Man is driven by self-preservation, and also by a lust for power. Self-preservation is the motive of all of man's actions, and it is his "right of nature" to pursue self-preservation at all costs (this is why laws must be introduced, according to Hobbes). Rousseau: Man is motivated by self-preservation **(Isn't self-preservation and instinct for Rousseau? 1159325305)**, but he is also driven by instinct, and compassion is a human instinct (the only "natural virtue"). Thus, it can moderate man's desire to harm others in order to achieve self-preservation.

Hobbes: Neither justice nor injustice can be present unless laws are present which prohibit certain actions. Therefore, justice is absent from the state of nature, and the institution of any form of society to provide a system of morality is imperative. Rousseau: There is no morality present in nature (men are neither good nor bad; his view is akin to Hobbes on this); however, Rousseau believes in compassion, which is a natural virtue that is di **(something got cut off 1159325305)**